<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting management costs – implications for Interims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.interimpartners.com/cutting-management-costs-%e2%80%93-implications-for-interims.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.interimpartners.com/cutting-management-costs-%e2%80%93-implications-for-interims.html</link>
	<description>Encouraging debate and discussion within the interim management sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Gentle</title>
		<link>http://blog.interimpartners.com/cutting-management-costs-%e2%80%93-implications-for-interims.html/comment-page-1#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Gentle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interimpartners.com/?p=394#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Reading Steve&#039;s note and thinking I would think that the NHS spend on Interims was pretty significant, so thinking positively 66% of that base may not be so terrible.

In terms of existing Interims transferring to fixed term contracts, that is likely to have implications completely contrary to strategies for mitigating the effects of IR35

I agree with Steve&#039;s comments in his last paragraph, quite often there are no internal resources to carry some projects, (for example running an EU compliant procurement campaign for clinical services), and Interims will still be required, albeit that their will be further downward pressure on rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Steve&#8217;s note and thinking I would think that the NHS spend on Interims was pretty significant, so thinking positively 66% of that base may not be so terrible.</p>
<p>In terms of existing Interims transferring to fixed term contracts, that is likely to have implications completely contrary to strategies for mitigating the effects of IR35</p>
<p>I agree with Steve&#8217;s comments in his last paragraph, quite often there are no internal resources to carry some projects, (for example running an EU compliant procurement campaign for clinical services), and Interims will still be required, albeit that their will be further downward pressure on rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

